http://jamiedurrant.com/2009/08/08/cg-stuntmen/ Rum ol' bugger, designer, tinkerer and collector. Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:06:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://jamiedurrant.com/2009/08/08/cg-stuntmen/#comment-46 Kat Parry Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:44:59 +0000 http://www.jamiedurrant.com/journal/?p=317#comment-46 I would agree. CGI can definantly take away from the immersion when it is blatently obvious. Unless the actions being performed are supposed to be unearthly (like a sci-fi movie or something that is high fantasy) I don't see the need for the portrayal of amazing stunt effects that couldn't happen naturally. I would agree. CGI can definantly take away from the immersion when it is blatently obvious. Unless the actions being performed are supposed to be unearthly (like a sci-fi movie or something that is high fantasy) I don’t see the need for the portrayal of amazing stunt effects that couldn’t happen naturally.

]]> http://jamiedurrant.com/2009/08/08/cg-stuntmen/#comment-45 Steve Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:04:16 +0000 http://www.jamiedurrant.com/journal/?p=317#comment-45 I found Spiderman jarring because the CGI stunts were quite noticable. Yet, I think super hero films sit right in the middle of this problem - how do you make someone's impossible physical abilities believable? I found Spiderman jarring because the CGI stunts were quite noticable. Yet, I think super hero films sit right in the middle of this problem – how do you make someone’s impossible physical abilities believable?

]]>